|
|
October 17th
Born:
Augustus III, king of Poland, 1696; John
Wilkes, noted demagogue, 1727, Clerkenwell, London;
William Scott, Baron Stowell, great consistorial
lawyer, 1745, Heworth, near Newcastle on Tyne.
Died:
Pope John VII, 707; Philip de Comines,
historian, 1509, Argenton, in Poitou; Andrew Osiander,
eminent Lutheran divine, 1552, Konigsberg; Sir Philip
Sidney, poet and hero, 1586, Arnheim, Holland; Sir
Edmundbury Godfrey, mysteriously murdered, 1678; Ninon
de Lenclos, celebrated beauty and wit, 1705; Dr. John
Ward, rhetorician, 1758; Frederic Chopin, musical
composer, 1849, Paris.
Feast Day:
St. Etheldreda or Audry, abbess of
Ely. St. Anstrudis or Austru, abbess at Laon, 688. St.
Andrew of Crete, 761. St. Hedwiges or Avoice, Duchess
of Poland, widow, 1243.
ST. ETHELDREDA OR
AUDRY
This saint, commemorated in the Romish calendar on
23
rd
June, but in the English calendar on 17th October,
in celebration of the translation of her relics from
the common cemetery of the nuns to a splendid marble
coffin within the church of Ely, was the daughter of a
king of East Anglia, and earned an exalted reputation
both by her piety and good works, and the maintenance
of an early vow of virginity which she observed
through life, though married successively to two Saxon
princes. She founded the convent and church of Ely on
the spot where the cathedral was erected at a
subsequent period, and died in 679 as its abbess.
Various churches throughout England are named after
her, among others Ely Cathedral, the patronage of
which, however, she shares with St. Peter.
From St. Etheldreda's more homely appellation of
St. Audry, is derived an adjective of the English
language in familiar use. At the fair of St. Audry, at
Ely, in former times, toys of all sorts were sold, and
a description of cheap necklaces, which, under the
denomination of tawdry laces, long enjoyed great
celebrity. Various allusions to tawdry laces occur in
Shakspeare, Spenser, and other writers of their age.
One time I gave thee a paper of pins,
Another time a tawdry lace,
And if thou wilt not grant me love,
In truth I'll die before thy face.'
Old Ballad.
'It was a happy age when a man might have wooed his
wench with a pair of kid-leather gloves, a silver
thimble, or with a tawdry lace; but now a velvet gown,
a chain of pearl, or a coach with four horses, will
scarcely serve the turn.' Rich's 'My Lady's Looking
glass,' 1616.
In process of time, the epithet tawdry came to be
applied to any piece of glittering tinsel or tarnished
finery.
SIR PHILIP SIDNEY
Sir Philip Sidney, the idol of his own, and the
boast of succeeding ages, was not quite thirty two
when he died. He lived long enough to afford, to all
who knew him, unmistakable promise of greatness, but
not so long as to leave to posterity any singular
proof of it. And yet we can read his character with
sufficient clearness, to feel assured that the
universal love of him was founded on a solid basis.
Though at times we catch glimpses of a certain
haughtiness, a hastiness, an ill tempered boldness of
valour, such as in an older man we should not have
looked for, we find, on the other hand, unmistakable
marks of a true hearted patriot, a wise statesman, a
skillful general, an elegant scholar, a graceful
writer, a kind patron, and a Christian gentleman.
Ophelia's description of Hamlet has often been applied
to him, and it seems to fail in no particular
�The courtier's, scholar's, soldier's, eye,
tongue, sword,
The expectancy and rose of the fair state,
The glass of fashion and the mould of form,
The observed of all observers.'
He was beautiful within and without: elegant as
well in fashion of person as in grace of mind.
�Imitate his virtues, studies, and actions,' said his
father to Sidney's younger brother, speaking of
Sydney;" he is a rare ornament of his age, the very formular
that all well disposed young gentleman of our court do
form their manners and life by... In truth, I speak it
without flattery of him or of myself, he hath the most
rare virtues that ever I found in any man.'
Sir Philip Sidney was named Philip after Philip of
Spain, as well from gratitude to that king, to whom
the family was beholden, as in honour of Mary. His
mother was a Dudley. Her father, her grandfather, her
brother, and her sister in law, Lady Jane Grey, had
all died on the scaffold; and this was the Dudley
blood of which Sidney was proud.
The events of Sidney's short career are not very
prominent in history. After leaving the university, he
traveled for some years. Being a Protestant, he
encountered some personal danger at Paris, where he
happened to be during the treacherous
massacre of St.
Bartholomew. Afterwards he was present at Venice, at a
time when that already waning power was making peace
with the Turk. Besides these particulars, there is
nothing worthy of remark in Sidney's travels. After
his return, his progress at court was slow. Elizabeth
employed him on several important embassies, in which
he gave entire satisfaction; but the queen had a way
of holding back ambitious youths of merit, and though
she was very fond of Sidney, and even took a journey
to stand godmother to his daughter Elizabeth, she
received his honest, unasked counsels, with
considerable coldness, while she appears, at the same
time, prudently to have acted on them. At last, she
stopped him in the very act of secretly embarking with
Sir Francis Drake on a voyage of discovery; and, as
she was always whimsical, instead of punishing him,
she made him governor of Flushing, a post which some
time previously he had applied for in vain. Sidney
threw himself heart and soul into the cause of the Low
Countries; took an important town by a skillful night
attack; shewed himself apt for war; and received his
death wound in the battle of Zutphen. This
battle of Zutphen,
so named, was not a battle.
A few hundred men were sent to intercept supplies,
which the Prince of Parma was conveying into the town,
and fell into an ambush of several thousands. Sidney,
from a restless thirst for adventure, had joined the
troop, unbidden, with other English leaders; and these
valiant men, to whom retreat was open, foolishly
performed prodigies of valor. Sidney, in a fit of
generous boldness, had thrown away his thigh armour,
because a friend had unintentionally come without his
own, and a ball shattered his thigh. He had the best
of attendance, his wife's nursing, and many tears of
true friends; but nothing remained for him but to die
a noble and Christian death, and to be borne in a
black ship over the still sea and up the Thames, to
lie in state many months, to have a national funeral,
and be laid in peace in old St. Paul's.
A curious contemporary ballad accurately describes
the melancholy close:
'The king of Scots bewrayed his grief in
learned verse,
And many more their passions penned, with praise
to deck his hearse.
The Flushingers made suit his breathless corpse to
have,
And offered a sumptuous tomb the same for to
engrave;
But 0, his loving friends, at their request did
grieve,
It was too much he lost his life, his corpse they
should not have.
And so from Flushing port, in ship attired with
black,
They did embark this perfect knight, that only
breath did lack;
The wind and seas did mourn to see this heavy
sight,
And into Thames did carry this much lamented
knight;
Unto the Minories his body was conveyed,
And there, under a martial hearse, three months or
more was laid;
But when the day was come he to his grave must go,
An host of heavy men repaired to see the solemn
show.'
Thus the pride of the English people
passed out of the view of men, and �for many months it
was counted indecent for any gentleman of quality to
appear, at court or in the city, in light or gaudy
apparel.'
King James of Scotland, as we have seen, wrote
certain sonnets; the two universities between them
produced three volumes of mournful elegies; and
Spenser honored his lost friend and patron with the
poem of Astrophel, which was published in company with
several others; the most beautiful of them, to our
taste, is The Dolefull Lay of Clorinda, because of its
true feeling; such true feeling as becomes well
Mary,
Countess of Pembroke, Sidney's sister, who is said to
have been the writer of it.
'0 Death! that hast us of such riches reft,
Tell us at least, what hast thou with it done?
What is become of him whose flowre here left
Is but the shadow of his likenesses gone?
Scarse like the shadow of that which he
was,
Nought like, but that he like a shade did pas.
But that immortal spirit, which was deckt
With all the dowries of celestiall grace,
By soveraine choyce from th' hevenly quires
select,
And lineally derived from Angels' race.
0! what is now of it become aread?
Ay me, can so divine a thing be dead?
Ah no! it is not dead, ne can it die,
But lives for aie, in blisfull paradise:
Where, like a new borne babe, it soft doth lie,
In bed of lillies wrapt in tender wise;
And compast all about with roses sweet,
And daintie violets from head to feet.
Three thousand birds, all of celestiall brood,
To him do sweetly carol day and night;
And with straunge notes, of him well understood,
Lull him a sleep in angelick delight;
Whilest in sweet Dreame to him presented bee
Immortall beauties, which no eye may see.'
Sidney was an author. His Defence of Poesy was the
earliest offspring of English criticism. His popular
romance of The Arcadia contains the prayer which
Charles I. copied for his own use, and which Milton
styled �heathenish,' when he wished to reproach
Charles with the employment of it. The prayer is put
in the mouth of a heathen woman, and contains no
distinct reference to the cardinal doctrines of
Christianity; but as it is both a beautiful
composition in itself; and has obtained a singular
celebrity through its appearance in Ikon Basilike, we
take this occasion to quote it:
PAMELA'S PRAYER
�0 all seeing Light, and eternal Life of all
things, to whom nothing is either so great that it may
resist, or so small that it is contemned; look upon my
misery with thine eye of mercy, and let thine infinite
power vouchsafe to limit out some proportion of
deliverance unto me, as to thee shall seem most
convenient. Let not injury, 0 Lord, triumph over me,
and let my faults by thy hand be corrected, and make
not mine enemy the minister of thy justice. But yet, 0
Lord, if, in thy wisdom, this be the aptest
chastisement for my inexcusable folly; if this low
bondage be fittest for my over high desires; and the
pride of my not enough humble heart be thus to be
broken, 0 Lord, I yield unto thy will, and joyfully
embrace what sorrow thou wilt have me suffer. Only
thus much let me crave of thee let my craving, 0 Lord,
be accepted of thee, since even that proceeds from
thee let me crave (even by the noblest title which in
my great affliction I may give myself, that I am thy
creature; and by thy goodness, which is thyself) that
thou wilt suffer some beams of thy majesty to shine
into my mind, that it may still depend confidently on
thee. Let calamity be the exercise, but not the
over-throw of my virtue: let their power prevail, but
prevail not to destruction. Let my greatness be their
prey; let my pain be the sweetness of their revenge;
let them (if so seem good unto thee) vex me with more
and more punishment. But, 0 Lord, let never their
wickedness have such a hand, but that I may carry a
pure mind in a pure body.'
Sidney was a poet also. His sonnets, under the
title of Astrophel and Stella, were first published
some years after his death. Sher true name was
Penelope Devereux: she was sister to Robert, Earl of
Essex, beheaded for treason, and who married Sidney's
widow.
Lastly, Sidney was a true friend and excellent
patron. Spenser owed to him the notice which Elizabeth
took of him: and Fulke Greville, Lord Brooke, who
wrote his life, felt himself honoured to be able to
have such a motto as the following engraved on his
tomb:
'Servant to Q. Elizabeth,
counsellor to K. James,
And Friend to Sir Philip Sidney,
Trophaeum Peccati.'
SIDNEY'S SISTER
Mary, Countess of Pembroke, the sister of Sir
Philip Sidney, made a name for herself by her poetical
writings, which, added to her beauty and amiability,
have placed her in the Pantheon of notable
Englishwomen. All the poets united in singing her
praises, Spenser described her as
'The gentlest shepherdess that lived that day,
And most resembling, both in shape and spirit,
Her brother dear.'
And that brother dedicated to her the celebrated
romance, which he wrote at her request, and therefore
entitled The Countess of Pembroke's Arcadia.
Mary Sidney married Henry, Earl of Pembroke, in
1576; her wedded life was short but happy. After her
husband's early death, she retired from the gaieties
of the court, devoting herself to the education of her
children, the enjoyments of literary leisure, and the
exercises of religion. Her longest poem, on the
sublime subject of our Saviour's Passion, was written
at this time; and though perhaps tinged with poetical
exaggeration, thus reflects the pious regrets of her
widowed life:
'My infant years misspent in childish toys,
My riper age in rules of little reason,
My better years in all mistaken joys
My present time (0 most unhappy season!)
In fruitless labour and in endless love,
0 what a horror bath my heart to prove!
I sigh to see my infancy misspent,
I mourn to find my youthful life misled,
I weep to feel my further discontent,
I die to try how love is living dead;
I sigh, I mourn, I weep, I living die,
And yet most live to know more misery.'
Sir Philip Sidney concludes his Apology for Poetry,
with a malediction on all those whose creeping souls
cannot look up to the sky of poesy; praying that they
may be unsuccessful in love, for lack of skill to
compose a sonnet, and that their memories may fade
from the earth, for want of an epitaph. His sister
neither merited nor obtained such a fate; her memory
having been honoured in lines more lasting than brass
or marble. Her epitaph, written by Ben Jonson, has
never been exceeded in the records of posthumous
praise:
�Underneath this sable hearse,
Lies the subject of all verse.
Sidney's sister, Pembroke's mother,
Death ere thou hast killed another,
Fair and learned, and good as she,
Time shall throw a dart at thee.'
To these simple and elegant lines, six more, of a I
rather inferior character, were subsequently added, by
an unknown author, supposed to be her son William,
Earl of Pembroke:
'Marble piles let no man raise
To her name, for after-days,
Some kind woman, good as she,
Reading this, like Niobe,
Shall turn marble and become
Both her mourner and her tomb.'
NINON DE LENCLOS
This celebrated beauty, who almost enjoyed, like
Helen of Troy, the gift of perennial youth, exhibits
in her life a striking illustration of French society
and morals during the seventeenth century, over nearly
the whole of which period her history extends, having
been born in 1616 and died in 1706, at the age of
ninety. Time seemed hardly to make any impression upon
her; and so enduring were her charms of person, that
even when she had passed her seventieth year, they
still retained the power of attracting admirers and
enkindling love. Nor were her attractions restricted
solely to those of face and figure. For conversational
wit or esprit that special prerogative of the French
nation she occupied a distinguished place, even in the
brilliant circles of Parisian society, in the reign of
Louis XIV. Of the general laxity which then prevailed
in social ethics, we need no more convincing proof
than the fact of' a person, who led so disreputable a
life as Ninon de Lenclos, being openly received into
the company of, and courted by individuals, male and
female, of the highest respectability and position.
Even Madame de Sevign�,
whose son was one of Ninon's
many lovers, could jestingly address her in her
letters as her belle fille; and the prudish and
bigoted Madame de Maintenon, after her own elevation
to the matrimonial couch of Louis XIV, did not
hesitate to invite this Aspasia of France to take up
her abode in the palace of Versailles.
The latter, however, preferred a life of licence
and freedom to the lugubrious restraint and austerity
which had just then been inaugurated at court. The
great Cond� sought repose after his military toils in
the society of Ninon, and the subtle La Rochefoucauld
could here only satisfy his longing for personal
beauty in conjunction with the charms of vivacity and
wit. Moli
P
re
and La Bruy
P
re
were constantly to be met in her salons, and what she
spoke they wrote; in the words of Jules Janin, hers
was spoken and theirs was written eloquence. She was
well informed on general subjects, spoke several
languages, was a thorough and enthusiastic student of
Montaigne, and performed with much skill on various
musical instruments. Christina, ex queen of Sweden,
paid her a visit, and declared, on leaving Paris, that
she had seen nothing more attractive there than the
illustrious Ninon.
Yet with all her natural advantages, and amid all
the splendours by which she was surrounded,
Mademoiselle de Lenclos was not happy, and used to
declare, in her old age, that were she compelled to
live over again her past years, she should certainly
commence by hanging herself. So impossible is it to
enjoy that serenity of mind, so essential to true
happiness, that �peace of God which passeth all
understanding,' where the life is a habitual violation
of the precepts of religion and morality, let us bask
ourselves as we may in the sunshine of worldly
pleasures, honours, and wealth.
The name of Ninon was a pet epithet bestowed on
Mademoiselle de Lenclos by her father, her baptismal
appellation being Anne. To the pernicious lessons
inculcated by this relative, who professed
unblushingly the grovelling and materialistic
doctrines popularly ascribed to Epicurus, most of the
subsequent errors of his daughter are to be traced. He
was a gentleman of good family in Touraine, and served
with distinction in the wars of Louis XIII against the
Huguenots. His wife was also of aristocratic birth
from the Orl�anais, and, with totally contrary
tendencies to her husband, was of a pious and even
ascetic turn of mind. Anne's natural disposition to
gaiety revolted against such undeviating regularity in
religious observances, whilst in her father she found
a friend but too ready to encourage her in her
determination to free herself from the salutary
restraint to which she was subjected by her mother.
When a girl of ten years old, it is said he had her
Dressed in boy's clothes, took her with him to the
camp, and instructed her in various military
exercises.
He died prematurely, and was followed, not long
afterwards, by his wife, who had vainly endeavored to
make a nun of her daughter, and expired recommending
her to the protection of God, to shield her from the
dangers to which she was exposed by her youth and
inexperience. These forebodings of affection and
maternal piety were but too fully realised. Deprived,
at the age of fifteen, of both her parents, left
entire mistress of her fortune and actions, with
unrivalled mental and personal attractions just
beginning to develop themselves, the heedless girl was
not long in putting the maxims of her father into
practice, and adopting the profession of the regular
courtesan. This character, refined no doubt though it
might be, but still the Traviata from first to last,
she maintained far beyond the usual period enjoyed by
women of her class. It must be recorded to her credit,
that she betrayed no tendencies to avarice, but was
liberal and generous with. her money, and was
perfectly free from malice in her disposition. There
can be no doubt of her possessing naturally many good
and amiable qualities, and that, had her early
education been more judiciously conducted, her career
in life might have been very different.
There seemed
to be nothing that she Dreaded more than forming a
permanent connection by marriage. One of the most unfavourable points in her
character, was the absence
of maternal feeling, which, apparently, had no place
in her breast. Of her two sons, one, called. La Boissi
P
re,
became an officer in the French navy, and died at
Toulon in 1732. The fate of the other, a son of the
Marquis of Gersay, and named. Villiers by his father,
possesses a singularly tragic interest, rivalling the
celebrated story of Oedipus. His parentage, at least
on the mother's side, had been carefully concealed
from him, and in this state of ignorance he reached
the age of nineteen. Having heard of the wondrous
charms of Ninon de Lenclos, which were celebrated over
France, he sought and obtained an introduction to her,
and became desperately enamoured at first sight. It
was not long before he declared his passion, and the
horror of his mother when he did so may be imagined.
Not wishing, if possible, to disclose the secret, she
implored the young man to moderate his ardour; but her
remonstrances rather adding fuel to the flame, she
found herself obliged to state the fact. The confusion
and horror experienced by Villiers on hearing this
unexpected announcement were so great, that he
snatched up a pistol and blew out his brains. Yet the
volatile mind of his mother was comparatively little
affected by so terrible an incident. This sad story
has been introduced by Le Sage as an episode into Gil
Blas.
THE POPISH PLOT:
MYSTERIOUS DEATH OF SIR EDMUNDBURY GODFREY
One of the most remarkable outbreaks of popular
prejudice recorded in British history, is the
celebrated so called Popish Plot in 1678, which for a
time may be said to have infected the English people
with an absolute frenzy, and was certainly the most
wide spread national delusion under which it ever
laboured. The fierceness of religious and political
zeal was only exceeded by the astonishing, and all but
universal, credulity that prevailed. And yet the
ferment excited throughout the country was by no means
wholly groundless, however extravagant may have been
its development. Let us glance for a moment at the
then social and political condition of England.
The eloquent pen of Macaulay
has familiarised his
countrymen with the remarkable changes inaugurated by
the Restoration, from republican theories to the
doctrine of passive obedience on the one hand, and
from the rigid austerity of puritanical morals to the
wildest libertinism and excess on the other. For a
time the court had it nearly all its own way, but it
was not long before a strong reaction set in, and a
jealous watch came to be maintained on the proceedings
of the king and government.
Foremost among the grounds of suspicion and
complaint were the popish leanings of the court, and
the influence universally believed to be exercised by
Catholics in controlling the affairs of the nation.
The avowed adherence by the Duke of York to the Romish
faith, the prospect of his ascending the throne in
default of heirs of the king's body, and a general
disposition on the part of the authorities to relax
the penal laws against the papists, excited the most
lively apprehensions throughout the kingdom,
apprehensions which were intensified from day to day.
The Dread of Puritans and sectaries began even in the
church to be extinguished by the fear of the
machinations of Jesuits, and the overthrow of
Protestantism. A secret but thoroughly organised
conspiracy was believed to be carried on for the
destruction of church and state, and no mode of
action, it was asserted, would be rejected, however
atrocious, provided it were calculated to insure
success. The
great fire of
London, in 1666, and
subsequent calamities of a similar nature, were
stoutly maintained to have been the work of the
papists. The opposition, or country party, with Shaftesbury at its head, gained
rapidly ground in
parliament, and a formal impeachment was sent up by
the Commons of the Lord Treasurer Danby, for corrupt
and unconstitutional measures. In the midst of the
agitation which preceded this last measure, the
revelation of the Popish Plot took place.
That a plot was really being carried on by the king
and his ministers is indisputable. The secret and
disgraceful compact between Charles II and Louis XIV,
by which the former, in return for an annual pension,
sold himself and his country to France, would, if
successfully carried out, have resulted in the total
overthrow of Protestantism by giving free scope to the
ambitious schemes of Louis, who would in return have
assisted his English brother in trampling into the
dust all popular rights, and rendering himself an
irresponsible sovereign. But the pretended conspiracy
revealed by Titus Oates was only calculated to divert
men's minds from the real matter in hand.
This worthy seems to have chosen the most fortunate
possible conjuncture for his revelations, as,
notwithstanding the gross and palpable contradictions
in his statements, the infamy of his previous
character, and his entire want of any trustworthy
evidence to support his allegations, his monstrous
tissue of falsehoods, accusing the Catholics of an
atrocious conspiracy to assassinate the king, massacre
all Protestants, and establish a popish dynasty in the
Duke of York, was received with the utmost gravity and
attention. From poverty and obscurity Oates suddenly
emerged into wealth and fame, and became the hero and
popular favourite of the day. He supplemented his
first declaration by additional matter, and from the
success which had attended his speculation on the
credulity of the public, other informers soon followed
in his steps. The ferment spread like wild fire, and
no statement, however absurd, which tended to
criminate the Catholics was rejected. Yet the common
sense of the nation might, in a short time, have
opened its eyes, had it not been for a mysterious
occurrence which goaded to madness its nerves, already
so highly strung.
The first deposition of Titus Oates was made on
27th September 1678, before Sir
Edmundbury Godfrey,
one of the magistrates for Westminster, who, however,
does not appear to have been a fanatical partisan of
the No Popery party, as Coleman, an agent of the Duke
of York, and seriously criminated by Oates's
statements, was a personal friend of his, and warned
by him in consequence of the danger to which he was
exposed. Godfrey, it has been said, was a man of a
melancholy temperament, and suffering at the time from
depression of spirits, but this assertion was
after-wards denied. He occupied a house in Green's
Lane, in the Strand, and about a fortnight after the
above deposition was made before him, left home at
nine o'clock on the morning of Saturday the 12th of
October. Shortly after this, he was seen in the neighbourhood of Marylebone, and
at noon of the same
day had an interview on business with one of the
churchwardens of St. Martin's in the Fields. From this
time he was never again seen alive. Surprise was felt
by his servants at home, at his neither returning in
the evening nor sending any message to inform them of
his intending to be absent for the night. Sunday came,
and no tidings of him; Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, and
Thursday followed with the like result. At six o'clock
on the evening of the last mentioned day (the 17th),
as two men were crossing a field on the south side of
Primrose Hill, they observed a sword belt, stick, and
pair of gloves lying by the side of the hedge, but
paid no attention to them at the time, and continued
their journey to the White House in the neighbourhood.
Arriving there, they happened to mention what they
had seen to the master of the house, who thereupon
recommended them to go back to the place, and offered
himself to accompany them. The three accordingly
started for the spot where they had seen the articles
in question; and having arrived there, one of them
stooped down to lift them, but happening at the same
time to look into the adjoining ditch, saw there the
body of a man lying on his face. It was Sir Edmundbury
Godfrey, with a sword run through his body, his face
bruised, and a livid mark round the neck, as if he had
been strangled. He was conveyed at once to the White
House, and information sent to the authorities. A jury
was impaneled, to inquire into the cause of his
death; but no definite conclusion could be come to
beyond the evidence furnished by two surgeons, that
his death must have been occasioned by strangulation,
and his body then pierced with the sword, which had
been left sticking in the wound. The ditch was Dry,
and there were no marks of blood in it, and his shoes
were perfectly clean, as if, after being assassinated,
he had been carried and deposited in the place where
he was found. A large sum of money and a diamond ring
were found in his pockets, but his pocketbook, in
which, as a magistrate, he used to take notes of
examinations, was missing. Spots of white wax, an
article which he never used himself, and which was
only employed by persons of distinction, and by
priests, were scattered over his clothes; and from
this circumstance people were led to conclude that the
Roman Catholics were the authors of his death. The
whole affair was an inscrutable mystery, but popular
impulse seizing hold of the circumstance that Oates
had made his deposition before him, and also that no
robbery had been committed, attributed at once his
murder to the vengeance of the papists.
London was now in a blaze. Here, it was maintained,
was a thorough confirmation of what Oates and his
companions had asserted of the bloody designs of the
Catholics. Stories soon came pouring in to increase
and spread the clamour, and among others, informations
were sworn to by persons, who pretended to have seen
Sir Edmundbury trepanned into an apartment near
Somerset House, then strangled, and his body conveyed
away in a sedan chair, and thence conveyed by a man on
horseback to the ditch at Primrose Hill. Though the
most glaring contradictions appeared in these
narratives, they were eagerly caught up and accepted
as gospel by an excited and furious people. To doubt
the reality of the Popish Plot was regarded as
tantamount to a participation in it. Oates, and
informers of a similar type, were caressed and
encouraged more than ever, and it will be readily
believed, that they did not suffer public enthusiasm
to languish from a lack of a proper supply of
nutriment. It was a time when, as Flume remarks,
�reason could no more be heard than a whisper in the
midst of the most violent hurricane.'
From White House, the corpse of Godfrey was carried
home to his own residence, where for two days it lay
in state, and was visited by vast multitudes. The
funeral was attended by an immense procession, at the
head of which walked seventy two clergymen of the
Church of England, in full canonicals, whilst the
minister who preached a sermon on the occasion, was
supported on each side by a stalwart brother divine,
lest he should be killed by the papists! If the murder
was really the work of a fanatic Roman Catholic, it
was a most ill judged procedure for the tranquillity
of his fellow religionists, as numbers of them,
priests as well as laymen, were ruthlessly immolated
to the popular fury. The mere fact of their being
Catholics, and being charged as participators in the
Popish Plot, was sufficient to insure their
condemnation with any jury. The real cause of
Godfrey's death has never been discovered, and to this
day it remains one of those mysterious occurrences of
which no satisfactory explanation can be given. An
undoubted fact, it stands out in melancholy prominence
amid the tissue of absurdities and falsehoods which
compose the substance of the Popish Plot.
October 18th
|
|
BACK TO TOP
>
|
|
|
|
|
|