Born: Louis XI of
France, 1423, Bourges; Henry Grattan, Irish
parliamentary orator, 1750, Dublin.
Died: Mary de Medicis,
consort of Louis XIII of France, 1642, Cologne;
Ferdinand, Duke of Brunswick, 1792, Brunswick.
Feast Day: St. Phocas,
martyr, 303; St. Gunthiern, abbot in Brittany, 6th
century; St. Bertram, bishop of Mans, 623; St. Guthagon, recluse at Oostkerk,
8th century.
HENRY GRATTAN
Ireland has great honour in
producing Henry Grattan, and she will never be
politically beyond hope while she continues to
venerate his memory. With every temptation to become
the tool of the British ministry, he came forward as
the unflinching advocate of the just rights and
independence of his country; a Protestant, he never
ceased to claim equal rights for an opposite class of
believers. In the blotted page of Irish history, it is
truly a bright spot where Grattan (1780) obtains in
the native parliament the celebrated resolution as to
its sole competency to make laws for Ireland. An
irreproachable private life admirably supports the
grandeur of his public career.
An anecdote of Grattan's
boyhood shews the possession of that powerful will
without which there can be no true greatness:
'When
very young, Mr. Grattan had been frightened by stories
of ghosts and hobgoblins, which nurses are in the
habit of relating to children, so much so, as to
affect his nerves in the highest degree. He could not
bear being left alone, or remaining long without any
person, in the dark. This feeling he determined to
overcome, and he adopted a bold plan. In the dead of
night he used to resort to a churchyard near his
father's house, and there he used to sit upon the
gravestones, whilst the perspiration poured down his
face; but by these efforts he at length succeeded and
overcame his nervous sensation. This certainly was a
strong proof of courage in a child.'�Memoirs of Henry
Grattan by his Son (1848), v. 212.
EXPIRATION OF THE CORNISH LANGUAGE
The 3rd of July is connected
(in a very slight manner, it must be acknowledged)
with an event of some importance�the utter death and
extinction of one of the ancient provincial languages
of England.
Many have been the conjectures
as to the person and to the locality, where lived the
last individual who could speak Cornish. Dr. Borlase,
who published his History in 1758, says that 'the
language had altogether ceased, so as not to be spoken
anywhere in conversation;' while Dr. Bryce of Redruth
affirms that the language had its last struggles for
life, at or about the wild prominences of the Land's
End. This fact Lhwyd, in a letter, March 10, 1701,
corroborates. Our doubts are, however, settled by the
detailed account of Dorothy Pentreath, alias Jeffries,
who, born in 1681, lived at Mouse-hole, near Penzance,
and conversed most fluently in the Cornish tongue. Her
father, a fisherman, sent this young Sibyl at the age
of twelve with fish to Penzance. In Cornish she sold
them, no improbability, as not until over twenty could
she speak a word of English. The name Pentreath
signifies the end of the sand. The following lines,
giving Cornish and English alternately, will serve to
confirm the occupation of the Pentreaths:
TO NEIGHBOUR NICHOLAS
PENTREATH
Contreoak Nicholas
Pentreath,
Neighbour Nicholas Pentreath,
Pa resso why doaz war an treath
When you come upon the sand,
Gen puseas, komero why wryth
With fish, take you care,
Tha geil compez, hedna yw fyr
To do right, that is wise,
Ha cowz meaz Dega, dega,
And speak aloud Tythe, Tythe,
Enna ew of guz dega g�r.
There is all your true tythe.
The Hon.
Daines Barrington,
who travelled in Cornwall in 1768, had an interview
with her, which is described in the Archceologia, vol.
iii.: 'When we reached Mouse-hole, I desired to be
introduced as a person who had laid a wager, that
there was no one who could converse in Cornish. Upon
which Dolly Pentreath spoke in an angry tone of voice
for two or three minutes, in a language which sounded
very much like Welsh. The hut in which she lived was
in a very narrow lane, opposite to two rather better
cottages, at the doors of which two other women stood,
advanced in years, and who, I observed, were laughing
at what Dolly Pentreath said to me. Upon this, I asked
them whether she had not been abusing me; to which
they answered: "Yes, very heartily, and because I
supposed she could not speak Cornish." I then said
they must be able to talk it; to which they answered,
they could not speak it readily, but that they
understood it, being only ten or twelve years younger
than Dolly Pentreath.'
Six years after this visit,
though bending with old age, and in her 87th year,
Dolly Pentreath could walk six miles in bad weather,
her intellect was unimpaired, and her memory so good
that she recollected the gentleman who had such a
curiosity to hear the Cornish language. The parish
maintained her in her poverty, while her
fortune-telling and gabbling Cornish also contributed
to her maintenance. She was short of stature, and
towards the end of her life somewhat deaf, but
positive that she was the only person who could speak
or know anything about the ancient tongue of her
country. She died January 1778, and was buried in Paul
Churchyard, where her epitaph, supposed to have been
written by Mr. Thomson of Truro, ran thus:
'Coth Doll Pentreath cans
ha dean,
Marow ha kledyz ed Paul pleu, Na ed an
Egloz, gan pobel bras,
Bes ed Egloz�hay coth Dolly es.'
Old Doll Pentreath, one
hundred aged and two,
Deceased, and buried in Paul parish. too,
Not in the church with folks great,
But in the churchyard, cloth old Dolly lie.
Thus much for Dolly. We also
learn that the language was not entirely lost by her
death; for a fisherman of Mouse-hole, in 1797,
informed Mr. Barrington, that one William Bodenoer was
the last person of that place who could speak in
Cornish. This man, some years younger than Dolly,
frequently conversed with her, but their conversation
was scarcely understood by any one of that place.
Impossible as it is precisely to fix upon the very
last conversationalist, all accounts agree in making
Dorothy the latest fluent speaker. Though her
successors may have understood the language, they were
unable to maintain a dialogue in the manner in which
she did. A letter from Bodenoer, dated July 3, 1776
two years before Dorothy's death), will shew the
condition of the language:
Bluth vee Eue try Gevree a
pemp,
Theatra vee pean boadjaek an poscas
Me rig deskey Cornoaek termen me vee maw,
Cornoaek ewe all ne,
Cea yes yen pobble younk.
My age is
threescore-and-five,
I am a poor fisherman,
I learned Cornish when I was a boy.
Cornish is all forgot With young people.'
Archaeologia, vol.
v.
Bodenoer died in 1794, leaving
two sons, who knew not enough of the Cornish to
converse in it. If the visitor to Penzance will direct
his steps three miles west of that place, he will hear
some-what of Dorothy Pentreath, and of that language,
which, now forgotten, found in her its last efficient
representative.
EXTRAORDINARY
CALCULATORS
On the 3rd of July 1839, some
of the eminent members of the Academy of Sciences at
Paris, including MM. Arago, Lacroix, Libri, and Sturm,
met to examine a remarkable boy, whose powers of
mental calculation were deemed quite inexplicable. The
boy, named Vito Mangiamele, a Sicilian, was the son of
a shepherd, and was about eleven years old. The
examiners asked him several questions which they knew,
under ordinary circumstances, to be tedious of
solution�such as, the cube root of 3,796,416, and the
10th root of 282,475,249; the first of these he
answered in half a minute, the second in three
minutes. One question was of the following complicated
character: What number has the following proportions,
that if its cube is added to 5 times its square, and
then 42 times the number. and the number 40 be
subtracted from the result, the remainder is equal to
0 or zero?' M. Arago repeated this question a second
time, but while he was finishing the last word, the
boy replied: 'The number is 5!'
Such cases greatly puzzle
ordinary mathematicians. Buxton, Colburn, and Bidder,
have at different times exhibited this unaccountable
power of accounting. Jedediah Buxton, although his
grandfather was a clergyman and his father a
schoolmaster, was so neglected in his education that
he could not even write; his mental faculties were
slow, with the one wonderful exception of his power of
mental arithmetic. After hearing a sermon, he
remembered and cared for nothing concerning it except
the number of words, which he had counted during their
delivery. If a period of time, or the size of an
object, were mentioned in his hearing, he almost
unconsciously began to count how many seconds, or how
many hair's-breadths there were in it. He walked from
Chesterfield to London on purpose to have the
gratification of seeing George II; and while in the
metropolis, he was taken much notice of by members of
the Royal Society.
On one occasion he went to see
Garrick
in Richard III; but instead of attending to the
performance in the usual way, he found occupation in
counting the number of words uttered by each
performer. After striding over a field in two or three
directions, he would tell the number of square inches
it contained. He could number all the pints of beer he
had drunk at all the houses he had ever visited during
half a century. He once set himself to reckon how much
a farthing would amount to if doubled 140 times; the
result came out in such a stupendous number of pounds
sterling as required 39 places of figures to represent
it.
In 1750 this problem was put
to him: to find how many cubical eighths of an inch
there are in a quadrangular mass measuring 23,145,789
yards long, 5,642,732 yards wide, and 54,965 yards
thick; he answered this, as all the others, mentally.
On one occasion he made himself what he called 'drunk
with reckoning' the following: 'In 200,000 million
cubic miles, how many grains of eight different kinds
of corn and pulse, and how many hairs one inch long?'
He ascertained by actual counting how many of each
kind of grain, and how many hairs an inch long, would
go to an inch cube, and then set himself about his
enormous self-imposed task. He could suspend any of
his problems for any length of time, and resume it at
the point where he left off; and could converse on
other subjects while thus employed. He could never
give any account of the way in which he worked out his
problems; nor did his singular but exceptional faculty
bring him any other advantage than that of being
invited to the houses of the gentry as a kind of show.
Zerah Colburn, who excited
much interest in London in 1812, was a native of
Vermont, in the United States. At six years old, he
suddenly shewed extraordinary powers of mental
calculation. By processes which seemed to be almost
unconscious to himself, and were wholly so to others,
he answered arithmetical questions of considerable
difficulty. When eight years old, he was brought to
London, where he astonished many learned auditors and
spectators by giving correct solutions to such
problems as the following: raise 8 up to the 16th
power; give the square root of 106,929: give the cube
root of 268,336,125; how many seconds are there in 48
years? The answers were always given in a very few
minutes�sometimes in a few seconds. He was ignorant of
the ordinary rules of arithmetic, and did not know how
or why particular modes of process came into his mind.
On one occasion, the Duke of Gloucester asked him to
multiply 21,734 by 543; something in the boy's manner
induced the duke to ask how he did it, from which it
appeared that the boy arrived at the result by
multiplying 65,202 by 181, an equivalent process; but
why he made this change in the factors, neither he nor
any one else could tell. Zerah Colburn was unlike
other boys also in this, that he had more than the
usual number of toes and fingers; a peculiarity
observable also in his father and in some of his
brothers.
An exceptional instance is
presented in the case of Mr. Bidder, of this faculty
being cultivated to a highly useful purpose.
George
Parker Bidder, when six years old, used to amuse
himself by counting up to 100, then to 1000, then to
1,000,000; by degrees he accustomed himself to
contemplate the relations of high numbers, and used to
build up peas, marbles, and shot, into squares, cubes,
and other regular figures. He invented processes of
his own, distinct from those given in books on
arithmetic, and could solve all the usual questions
mentally more rapidly than other boys with the aid of
pen and paper. When he became eminent as a civil
engineer, he was wont to embarrass and baffle the
parliamentary counsel on contested rail-way bills, by
confuting their statements of figures almost before
the words were out of their mouths. In 1856, he gave
to the Institution of Civil Engineers an interesting
account of this singular arithmetical faculty�so far,
at least, as to shew that memory has less to do with
it than is generally supposed; the processes are
actually worked out seriatim, but with a rapidity
almost inconceivable.