Born: Francoise
d'Aubign�, Marquise de Maintenon, second consort of
Louis XIV, 1635, Niort; Henri Francois d'Aguesseau,
chancellor of France, 1668, Limoges; Robert Lowth,
bishop of London, biblical critic, 1710;
John Murray,
publisher, 177S.
Died:
Horace, lyric and satirical poet, 8 B.C.;
Clovis, first king of France, 611, Purls; Maurice,
Roman emperor, beheaded at Chalcedon, 602; Louis,
Chevalier de Rohan, executed at Paris for conspiracy,
1674; Basil Montagu, Q.C. (writings on philosophical
and social questions, he.), 1851, Boulogne.
Feast Day:
St. James, surnamed Intercisus,
martyr, 421. St. Maharsapor, martyr, 421. St. Secundin
or Seachnal, bishop of Dunseachlin or Dunsaghlin, in.
Meath, 417. St. Maximus, bishop of Riez, confessor,
about 460. St. Virgil, bishop of Saltzburg, confessor,
784.
ADVENT SUNDAY
The four weeks immediately preceding Christmas are
collectively styled Advent, a term denoting approach
or arrival, and are so called in reference to the
coming celebration of the birth of our Saviour. With
this period, the ecclesiastical or Christian year is
held to commence, and the first Sunday of these four
weeks is termed Advent Sunday, or the first Sunday in
Advent. It is always the nearest Sunday to the feast
of St. Andrew, whether before or after that day; so
that in all cases the season of Advent shall contain
the uniform number of four Sundays. In 1864, Advent
Sunday falls on the 27th of November, the earliest
possible date on which it can occur.
THE GREAT STORM
Early on the morning of Saturday, the 27th November
1703, occurred one of the most terrific storms
recorded in our national history. It was not merely,
as usually happens, a short and sudden burst of
tempest, lasting a few hours, but a fierce and
tremendous hurricane of a week's duration, which
attained its utmost violence on the day above
mentioned. The preceding Wednesday was a peculiarly
calm, fine day for the season of the year, but at four
o'clock in the afternoon a brisk gale commenced, and
increased so strongly during the night, that it would
have been termed a great storm, if a greater had not
immediately followed. On Thursday, the wind slightly
abated; but on Friday it blew with redoubled force
till midnight, from which time till daybreak on
Saturday morning, the tempest was at its extreme
height. Consequently, though in some collections of
dates the Great Storm is placed under the 26th of
November, it actually took place on the following day.
Immediately after midnight, on the morning of
Saturday, numbers of the affrighted inhabitants of
London left their beds, and took refuge in the cellars
and lower apartments of their houses. Many thought the
end of the world had arrived. Defoe, who experienced
the terrors of that dreadful night, says:
"Horror and
confusion seized upon all; no pen can describe it, no
tongue can express it, no thought conceive it, unless
some of those who were in the extremity of it."
It was
not till eight o'clock on the Saturday morning, when
the storm had slightly lulled, that the boldest could
venture forth from the shelter of their dwellings, to
seek assistance, or inquire for the safety of friends.
The streets were then thickly strewed with bricks,
tiles, stones, lead, timber, and all kinds of building
materials. The storm continued to rage through the
day, with very little diminution in violence, but at
four in the afternoon heavy torrents of rain fell, and
had the effect of considerably reducing the force of
the gale.
Ere long, however, the hurricane recommenced with
great fury, and in the course of the Sunday and Monday
attained such a height, that on Tuesday night few
persons dared go to bed. Continuing till noon on
Wednesday, the storm then gradually decreased till
four in the afternoon, when it terminated in a dead
calm, at the very hour of its commencement on the same
day of the preceding week.
The old and dangerously absurd practice of building
chimneys in stacks, containing as many bricks as a
modern ordinary sized house, was attended by all its
fatal consequences on this occasion. The bills of
mortality for the week recorded twenty one deaths in
London alone, from the fall of chimneys. After the
tempest, houses bore a resemblance to skeletons.
Fortunately, three weeks of dry weather followed,
permitting the inhabitants to patch up their dwellings
with boards, tarpaulins, old sails, and straw; regular
repairs being in many instances, at the time, wholly
impossible. Plain tiles rose in price from one guinea
to six pounds per thousand; and pan tiles from fifty
shillings to ten pounds, for the same number.
Bricklayers' wages rose in proportion, so that even in
the case of large public edit lees, the trustees or
managers bestowed on them merely a temporary repair,
till prices should fall. During 1701, the Temple,
Christ's Hospital, and other buildings in the city of
London, presented a remarkable appearance, patched
with straw, reeds, and other thatching materials.
At Wells, the bishop of that diocese and his wife
were killed, when in bed, by a stack of chimneys
falling upon them. Defoe, from personal observation,
relates that, in the county of Kent alone,
1107 dwelling houses and barns were leveled by the
tremendous force of the hurricane. Five hundred grand
old trees were prostrated in Penshurst, the ancient
park of the Sidneys, and numerous orchards of fruit
trees were totally destroyed.
The same storm did great damage in Holland and
France, but did not extend far to the northward; the
border counties and Scotland receiving little injury
from it. The loss sustained by the city of London was
estimated at one million, and that of Bristol at two
hundred thousand pounds. Great destruction of property
and loss of life occurred on the river Thames. The
worst period of the storm there, was from midnight to
daybreak, the night being unusually dark, and the tide
extraordinarily high. Five hundred. watermen's
wherries, 300 ship boats, and 120 barges were
destroyed; the number of persons drowned could never
be exactly ascertained, but 22 dead bodies were found
and interred.
The greatest destruction of shipping, however, took
place off the coast, where the fleet, under the
command of Sir Cloudesley Shovel, had just returned
from the Mediterranean. The admiral, and part of his
ships anchored near the Gunfleet, rode out the gale
with little damage; but of the vessels lying in the
Downs few escaped. Three ships of 70 guns, one of 64,
two of 56, one of 46, and several other smaller
vessels, were totally destroyed, with a loss of 1500
officers and men, among whom was Rear admiral
Beaumont.
It may surprise many to learn that the
elaborate
contrivances for saving life from shipwreck date from
no distant period. Even late in the last century, the
dwellers on the English coasts considered themselves
the lawful heirs of all drowned persons, and held that
their first duty in the case of a wreck was to secure,
for their own behalf, the property which Providence
had thus east on their shores. That they should exert
themselves to save the lives of their fellow
creatures, thus imperiled, was an idea that never
presented itself. Nay, superstition, which ever has
had a close connection with self interest, declared it
was unlucky to rescue a drowning man from his fate. In
the humane endeavour to put an end to this horrible
state of matters,
Burke, in 1776, brought a bill into
parliament, enacting that the value of plundered
wrecks should be levied from the inhabitants of the
district where the wreck occurred. The country
gentlemen, resenting the bill as an attack on their
vested interests, vehemently opposed it. The govermment of the day also, requiring
the votes of the
county members to grant supplies for carrying on the
war against the revolted. American colonies, joined in
the opposition, and threw out the bill, as Will
Whitehead expresses it:
'To make Squire Boobies willing,
To grant supplies at every check,
Give them the plunder of a wreck,
They'll vote another shilling.'
This allusion to the change which has taken place
in public feeling on the subject of wrecks, was
rendered necessary to explain the following incident
in connection with the Great Storm. At low water, on
the morning after the terrible hurricane, more than
two hundred men were discovered on the treacherous
footing of the Goodwin Sands, crying and gesticulating
for aid, well knowing that in a very short time, when
the tide rose, they would inevitably perish. The
boatmen were too busy, labouring in their vocation of
picking up portable property, to think of saving life.
The mayor of Deal, an humble slopseller, but a man of
extraordinary humanity for the period, went to the
custom house, and begged that the boats belonging to
that establishment might be sent out to save some, at
least, of the poor men. The custom house officers
refused, on the ground that this was not the service
for which their boats were provided. The mayor then
collected a few fellow tradesmen, and in a short
speech so inspired them with his generous emotions,
that they seized the custom house boats by force, and,
going off to the sands, rescued as many persons as
they could from certain death. The shipwrecked men
being brought to land, naked, cold, and hungry, what
was to be done with them? The navy agent at Deal
refused to assist then, his duties being, he said, to
aid seamen wounded in battle, not shipwrecked men.
The worthy mayor, whose name was Powell, had
therefore to clothe and feed these poor fellows,
provide them with lodgings, and bury at his own
expense some that died. Subsequently, after a long
course of petitioning, he was reimbursed for his
outlay by government; and this concession was followed
by parliament requesting the queen to place
shipwrecked seamen in the same category as men killed
or wounded in action. The widows and children of men
who had perished in the Great Storm, were thus placed
on the pension list.

The Great Storm: Destruction of
the first Eddystone Light House
The most remarkable of the many edifices destroyed
during that dreadful night was the first Eddystone
lighthouse, erected four years previously by an
enterprising but incompetent individual, named
Winstanley. He had been a mercer in London, and,
having acquired wealth, retired to Littlebury, in
Essex, where he amused himself with the curious but
useless mechanical toys that preceded our modern
machinery and engineering, as alchemy and astrology
preceded chemistry and astronomy. As a specimen of
these, it is related that, in one room of his house,
there lay an old slipper, which, if a kick were given
it, immediately raised a ghost from the floor; in
another room, if a visitor sat down in a seemingly
comfortable arm chair, the arms would fly round his
body, and detain him a close prisoner, till released
by the ingenious inventor. The light horse was just
such a specimen of misapplied ingenuity as might have
been expected from such an intellect. It was built of
wood, and deficient in every element of stability. Its
polygonal form rendered it peculiarly liable to be
swept away by the waves.
It was no less exposed to the action of the wind,
from the upper part being ornamented with large wooden
candlesticks, and supplied with useless vanes, cranes,
and other top hamper, as a sailor would say. It is
probable that the design of this singular edifice had
been suggested to Winstanley by a drawing of a Chinese
pagoda. And this lighthouse, placed on a desolate rock
in the sea, was painted with representations of suns
and compasses, and mottoes of various kinds; such as
Post TENEBRAS LUX, GLORY BE TO God, PAX IN BELLO. The
last was probably in allusion to the building's
fancied security, amidst the wild war of waters. And
that such peace might be properly enjoyed, the
lighthouse contained, besides a kitchen and
accommodation for the keepers, a stateroom, finely
carved and painted, with a chimney, two closets, and
two windows.
There was also a splendid bedchamber, richly gilded
and painted. This is Winstanley's own description,
accompanying an engraving of the lighthouse, in which
he complacently represents himself fishing from the
stateroom window. One would suppose he had designed
the building for an eccentric ornament to a garden or
a park, were it not that, in his whimsical ingenuity,
he had contrived a kind of movable shoot on the top,
by which stones could be showered down on any side, on
an approaching enemy. Men, who knew by experience the
aggressive powers of sea waves, remonstrated with
Winstanley, but he declared that he was so well
assured of the strength of the building, that he would
like to be in it during the greatest storm that ever
blew under the face of heaven. The confident architect
had, a short time previous to the Great Storm, gone to
the lighthouse to superintend some repairs. When the
fatal tempest came, it swept the flimsy structure into
the ocean, and with it the unfortunate Winstanley, and
five other persons who were along with him in the
building.
There is a curious bit of literary history
indirectly connected with the Great Storm. Addison,
distressed by indigence, wrote a poem on the victory
of Blenheim, in which he thus compares the Duke of
Marlborough, directing the current of the great fight,
to the Spirit of the Storm:
'So when an angel, by divine command,
With rising
tempests shakes a guilty land,
Such as of late o'er
pale Britannia past,
Calm and serene, he drives the
furious blast.
And pleased th' Almighty's orders to
perform,
Rides in the whirlwind, and directs the
storm.'
Lord Godolphin was so pleased with this simile,
that he immediately appointed Addison to the
Commissionership of Appeals, the first public
employment conferred on the essayist.
CIRCUMSTANCES AT
THE DEATH OF THOMAS, LORD
LYTTELTON
Thomas, second Lord Lyttelton, who died November
27, 1779, at the age of thirty five, was as remarkable
for his reckless and dissipated life not to speak of
impious habits of thought as his father had been for
the reverse. One of the wicked actions attributed to
him, was the seduction of three Misses Amphlett, who
resided near his country residence in Shropshire. He
had just returned from Ireland where he left one of
these ladies when, residing at his house in Hill
Street, Berkeley Square, he was attacked with
suffocating fits of a threatening character. According
to one account, he dreamed one night that a fluttering
bird came to his window, and that presently after a
woman appeared to him in white apparel, who told him
to prepare for death, as he would not outlive three
days. He was much alarmed, and called for his servant,
who found him in a profuse perspiration, and to whom
he related the circumstance which had occurred.
According to another account, from a relative of his
lordship, he was still awake when the noise of a bird
fluttering at the window called his attention; his
room seemed filled with light, and he saw in the
recess of the window a female figure, being that of a
lady whom he had injured, who, pointing to the clock
on the mantel piece, then indicating twelve o'clock,
said in a severe tone that, at that hour on the third
day after, his life would be concluded, after which
she vanished and left the room in darkness.
That some such circumstance, in one or other of
these forms, was believed by Lord Lyttelton to have
occurred, there can be no reasonable doubt, for it left
him in a depression of spirits which caused him to
speak of the matter to his friends. On the third day,
he had a party with him at breakfast, including Lord Fortescue, Lady Flood, and
two Misses Amphlett, to
whom he remarked: 'If I live over tonight, I shall
have jockeyed the ghost, for this is the third day.'
The whole party set out in the forenoon for his
lordship's country house, Pit Place, near Epsom, where
he had not long arrived when he had one of his
suffocating fits. Nevertheless, he was able to dine
with his friends at five o'clock. By a friendly trick,
the clocks throughout the house, and the watches of
the whole party, including his lordship's, were put
forward half an hour. The evening passed agreeably;
the ghostly warning was never alluded to; and Lord
Lyttelton seemed to have recovered his usual gaiety.
At half past eleven, he retired to his bedroom, and
soon after got into bed, where he was to take a dose
of rhubarb and mint water. According to the report
afterwards given by his valet, he kept every now and
then looking at his watch. He ordered his curtains to
be closed at the foot. It was now within a minute or
two of twelve by his watch: he asked to look at mine,
and seemed pleased to find it nearly keep time with
his own. His lordship then put both to his ear, to
satisfy himself that they went. When it was more than
a quarter after twelve by our watches, he said:
"This
mysterious lady is not a true prophetess, I find."
When it was near the real hour of twelve, he said:
"Come, I'll wait no longer; get me my
medicine; I'll take it, and try to sleep."
Perceiving the man
stirring the medicine with a toothpick, Lord Lyttelton
scolded him, and sent him away for a teaspoon, with
which he soon after returned. He found his master in a
fit, with his chin, owing to the elevation of the
pillow, resting hard upon his neck. Instead of trying
to relieve him, he ran for assistance, and when he
came back with the alarmed party of guests, Lord
Lyttelton was dead.
Amongst the company at Pit Place that day, was Mr.
Miles Peter Andrews, a companion of Lord Lyttelton.
Having business at the Dartford powder mills, in which
he was a partner, he left the house early, but not
before he had been pleasingly assured that his noble
friend was restored to his usual good spirits. So
little did the ghost adventure rest in Mr. Andrews's
mind, that he did not even recollect the time when it
was predicted the event would take place. He had been
half an hour in bed at his partner, Mr. Pigou's house
at the mill, when suddenly his curtains were pulled
open, and Lord Lyttelton appeared before him at his bedside, in his robe de
chambre and night cap. Mr. Andrews looked at him some
time, and thought it so odd a freak of his friend,
that he began to reproach him for his folly in coming
down to Dartford Mills without notice, as he could
find no accommodation. However, said he, I'll get up,
and see what can be done. He turned to the other side
of the bed, and rang the bell, when Lord Lyttelton
disappeared. His servant soon after coming in, he
inquired: "Where is Lord Lyttelton?" The servant, all
astonishment, declared he had not seen anything of his
lordship since they left Pit Place. "Pshaw! you fool,
he was here this moment at my bedside." The servant
persisted that it was not possible. Mr. Andrews
dressed himself, and with the assistance of the
servants, searched every part of the house and garden;
but no Lord Lyttelton was to be found. Still Mr.
Andrews could not help believing that Lord Lyttelton
had played him this trick, till, about four o'clock
the same day, an express arrived to inform him of his
lordship's death, and the manner of it.
An attempt has been made to invalidate the truth of
this recital, but on grounds more than usually weak.
It has been surmised that Lord Lyttelton meant to take
poison, and imposed the story of the warning on his
friends; as if he would have chosen for a concealment
of his design, a kind of imposture which, as the
opinions of mankind go, is just the most hard of
belief. This supposition, moreover, overlooks, and is
inconsistent with, the fact that Lord Lyttelton was
deceived as to the hour by the tampering with the
watches; if he meant to destroy himself, he ought to
have done it half an hour sooner. It is further
affirmed and the explanation is said to come from Lord
Fortescue, who was of the party at Pit Place that the
story of the vision took its rise in a recent chase
for a lady's pet bird, which Lord Lyttelton declared
had been harassingly reproduced to him in his dreams.
Lord Fortescue may have been induced, by the usual
desire of escaping from a supra natural theory, to
surmise that the story had some such foundation; but
it coheres with no other facts in the case, and fails
to account for the impression on Lord Lyttelton's
mind, that he had been warned of his coming death a
fact of which all his friends bore witness.
On the other hand, we have the Lyttelton family
fully of belief that the circumstances were as here
related. Dr. Johnson tells us, that he heard it from
Lord Lyttelton's uncle, Lord Westcote, and he was
therefore willing to believe it. There was, in the
Dowager Lady Lyttelton's house, in Portugal Street,
Grosvenor Square, a picture which she herself executed
in 1780, expressly to commemorate the event; it hung
in a conspicuous part of her drawing room. The dove
appears at the window, while a ,female figure, habited
in white, stands at the foot of the bed, anouncing to
Lord Lyttelton his dissolution. Every part of the
picture was faithfully designed, after the description
given to her by the valet de chambre who attended him,
to whom his master related all the circumstances. The
evidence of Mr. Andrews is also highly important. Mr.
J. W. Croaker, in his notes on Boswell, attests that
he had more than once heard Mr. Andrews relate the
story, with details substantially agreeing with the
recital which we have quoted from the Gentleman's
Magazine. He was unquestionably good evidence for what
occurred to himself, and he may be considered as not a
bad reporter of the story of the ghost of the lady
which he had heard from Lord Lyttelton's own mouth.
Mr. Croker adds, that Mr. Andrews always told the tale
reluctantly, and with an evidently solemn conviction
of its truth. On the whole, then, the Lyttelton ghost
story may be considered as not only one of the most
remarkable from its compound character one spiritual
occurrence supporting another but also one of the best
authenticated, and which it is most difficult to
explain away, if we are to allow human testimony to be
of the least value.
PITT AND HIS TAXES
The great increase in taxation subsequent to the
conclusion of the first American war, is a well known
circumstance in modern British history. The national
debt, which, previous to the commencement of the Seven
Years War in 1755, fell short of �75,000,000, was,
through the expenses entailed by that conflict,
increased to nearly �129,000,000 at the peace of Paris
in 1763, while, twenty years subsequently, at the
peace of Versailles, in 1783, the latter amount had
risen to upwards of �244,000,000, in consequence of
the ill judged and futile hostilities with the North
American colonies.
When William Pitt,
the youngest premier and chancellor of exchequer that
England had ever seen, and at the time only twenty
four years of age, came into office in December 1783,
on the dismissal of the Coalition cabinet, he found
the finances in such a condition as to necessitate the
imposition of various new taxes, including, among
others, the levying of an additional rate on windows,
and also of duties on game certificates, hackney
coaches, and saddle and race horses. This may be
regarded as the commencement of a train of additional
burdens on the British nation, which afterwards,
during the French war, mounted to such a height, that
at the present day it seems impossible to comprehend
how our fathers could have supported so crushing a
load on their resources.
Opposite views prevail as to the expediency of the
measures followed by England in 1793, when the
country, under the leadership of such champions as
Pitt and Burke, drifted into a war with the French
republic; a war, however, which, in the conjuncture,
of circumstances attending the relations between the
two countries, must have almost inevitably taken
place, sooner or later. At the present day, indeed,
when more liberal and enlightened ideas prevail on
international questions, and we have also had the
benefit of our fathers experience, such a consummation
might possibly have been avoided. Of the
straightforwardness and vigorous ability of Pitt
throughout his career, there can be no doubt, how-ever
one sided he may have been in his political
sympathies; and a tribute of respect, though opinions
will differ as to its grounds, is undoubtedly due to
the pilot that weathered the storm.
A defiance to Pitt's Horse Tax.
A farmer riding his cow to Stockport market
|
The taxes imposed by Pitt, as might have been
anticipated, caused no inconsiderable amount of
grumbling among the nation at large. This grumbling,
in many instances, resolved itself into waggish jests
and caricatures.
The story of the Edinburgh wit, who
wrote 'PITT'S WORK'S', on the walls of the houses where
windows had been blocked up by the proprietors in
consequence of the imposition of an additional duty,
is a well known and threadbare joke.
Another jest, which took a practical form, was that
concocted by a certain Jonathan Thatcher, who, on
27th
November 1784, in defiance of the horse tax, imposed a
few months previously by Pitt, rode his cow to and
from the market of Stockport. A contemporary
caricature, representing that scene, is herewith
presented to our readers as a historical curiosity.